VueScan seems to recognize the LS-2000 (shows in the Input Tab screen under source), but when I click on scan, I get the message: Scanner not found. Dibekali berbagai fitur, aplikasi ini membantu Anda mendapatkan hasil scan terbaik. Saat proses scan, Anda dapat meninjau foto atau dokumen terlebih dahulu.
VUESCAN INI SOFTWARE
I downloaded VueScan 8.01 and was trying to see if it works prior to buying it. Vuescan adalah Aplikasi yang diluncurkan oleh Hamrick Software untuk perangkat dengan sistem operasi Windows. I downloaded VueScan and tried using it with my LS-2000, but VueScan insists that the scanner was not found. For output, monitors can’t see 16 bit, printers can print 16 bit.Īt any rate, it is moot for your purposes, as you can’t open 16 bit images with Elements. Human eyeballs prove that it’s a rare image that will matter. Histograms prove that many editing funcitons in 16 bit are less destructive and all around better. There are entire libraries of info re this if you want to Google, or peruse UseNet archives for and/or. 16 bit editing is one of the digital imaging jihads. And yes 16 bit files are exactly twice as big as 8 bit.Ĩ vs. Elements can’t do 16 bit so opens your file at 8 bit. So either you must save in 8 bit, where the 12 bits are analyzed and the best 8 bits are used, or save in 16 bit, where all twelve bits are used and the extra 4 are either interpolated or padded with zeros (I forget which).Īt any rate, I have a LS2000, but I haven’t used the NikonScan software in sometime (I use VueScan). If I can get equal-quality results without having to worry about either calibrating each roll or storing multiple INIs, that would be ideal.Your scanner has 12 bit firmware capability. Hence my original desire to save some time with multiple pre-calibrated INIs.Ĭould it be this workflow is needlessly complicated? I'd love to hear your thoughts as to whether or not this technique is worthwhile. The one I've settled on is very similar to the techniques described at a couple of sites, perhaps best explained here: Īs you can see, this basically requires a "calibration phase" for each roll to set black to the clear film base rather than just the maximum value. The difference I think is in the workflow to get there. Aplikasi yang satu ini benar-benar merupakan scanner yang sangat bagus dan banyak sekali digunakan oleh orang-orang di seluruh dunia karena memang hasil pemindaian dengan software ini benar-benar sempurna.
VUESCAN INI FULL VERSION
However, even saving as a raw scan you still have to set the exposure under the input tab (or allow vuescan to do it for you), no? This would be independent of any fiddling with the curves on the "color" tab, which I basically turn off. Vuescan Full Version 9.7.53 adalah sebuah program scanner terbaik yang ada hingga saat ini. Like you, I'm always aiming for a flat scan without any clipping, and do everything in PS rather than in-scanner. That way you could just find your film/dev combo, load the appropriate INI in Vuescan and Robert's your mother's brother. If it is worthwhile I'd be happy to share my few INIs - maybe we could collectively build up a library of INIs for everyone to use. Which leads me to my question: Is it worth doing this or will fb+f and exposure be too variable between rolls to get consistent results? As a result, I spend a lot of time going through the motions with the "lock exposure" and "lock film base" features to get the most out of my scans.Īt any rate, I've recently started saving my ini files for each film/dev combo (well, generally its film x + rodinal heh) under the (possibly mistaken?) assumption that by keeping my techniques relatively consistent I can just load the new ini, line up the negs, and hit scan.
I was wondering: I scan most of my negs in Vuescan, and one thing that can be a bit time consuming (read: annoying) is each new film/dev combo you use can result in different fb+f etc.
0 kommentar(er)
